I’ve never consciously thought about how lucky I’ve been
throughout my life to have drinkable tap water. But yesterday an article in the
New York Times made me think twice about how lucky we all are. The article is
titled “The Problem is Clear: The Water is Filthy.” The article describes the
life people in Seville, CA, a small, impoverished agricultural community whose
tap water is contaminated and deemed toxic to drink. Seville’s groundwater is
contaminated due to over 50 years of animal waste, pesticides, and chemical
fertilizers being deposited into the land through farming.
The author chronicles the daily lives of citizens of Seville
who have to fill up five-gallon jugs at a corner store every day in order to be
able to cook, bathe and brush their teeth. The local school has to budget up to
$500 dollars a month for bottled water in order to provide water for its
students.
One of the points of this article is to show how migrant
agricultural workers often bear the “social costs” of food production. Learning
about social and environmental damages to small agricultural towns like Seville
reminds me that our ability to buy cheap produce in the supermarket does not
come without ramifications. We need to remember and realize that there is an
entire population of people whose lives are explicitly dedicated to meeting the
food needs of people like us. While I have driven by some of these communities
in California and seen them in real life, I find myself constantly forgetting
of the fact that cheap food usually means a compromise for either food
companies or their workers. More often than not the burden usually falls on the
workers.
As we’ve talked about in class, there will always be some
form of negative ramifications of farming. While farming will never be perfect,
we need to make a stronger effort to try to reduce the negative environmental
outcomes of large-scale farming practices. Of course there are pros and cons to
using pesticides and chemicals on certain crops, but examples like Seville make
me more sympathetic to forms of farming that do not contaminate the
environment. In cases like this, the lives of many are put in jeopardy in order
to increase corporate profits. I find this problematic. Should clean water be a
right that everyone is entitled to? I think the answer is undoubtedly yes.
Ally, I'm really glad that you posted on this article. This is an issue that I researched and wrote about as part of my study of the produce industry in California. It's sad to see that an issue I first learned about more than 15 years ago is still a problem in California's agricultural communities.
ReplyDelete